PELATIHAN PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE SEBAGAI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA BAGI MGMP IPA KABUPATEN MUSI RAWAS
Keywords:
Socioscientific issues, learning device, science teaching and learningAbstract
Using socioscientific issues (SSI) can make learning science more relevant to student life. The problem identified is still the lack of the ability of science teachers in Musi Rawas district to develop defense devices. The training aimed to improve science teacher skills to develop learning devices based on SSI in the JHS based on the Merdeka Curriculum. At the in-service training activity, participants study and discuss the material presented by the trainer. During the job training, participants undertake independent learning activities to develop the SSI-based science teaching module following the tasks assigned to the service training activity. The results showed an improvement in the participants' SSI understanding of SSI, accompanied by an increased awareness of how to associate SSI with science learning. An increase in participants' understanding of how to identify and choose relevant SSI to be taught in the classroom and how to facilitate the discussion of SSI that encourages critical thinking and moral reflection. In addition, there has been an increase in the confidence to be able to guide students in the analysis of information and various perspectives as well as to make decisions related to SSI.
References
Åkerblom, D., & Lindahl, M. (2017). Authenticity and the relevance of discourse and figured worlds in secondary students’ discussions of socioscientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.025
Cian, H. (2020). The influence of context: comparing high school students’ socioscientific reasoning by socioscientific topic. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1767316
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.3.CO;2-1
Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315.
Gaible, E., & Burns, M. (2005). Using technology to train teachers: Appropriate uses of ICT for teacher professional development in developing countries. infoDev / World Bank. http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.13.html
Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Integrating socio-scientific issues to enhance the bioethical decision-making skills of high school students. International Education Studies, 8(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p142
Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Ozer, F. (2022). Exploring pre‑service biology teachers’ informal reasoning and decison-making about covid-19. Science & Education, 31, 325–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00272-5
Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.593164
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Controversial issues in the science classroom. In Phi Delta Kappan (Vol. 99, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745544
Pedretti, E., & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320505
Plake, B. S. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teacher’s competencies in the educational assessment studen. Mid-Western Educational Research, 6(1), 21–27.
Romine, William L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368
Romine, William Lee, Sadler, T. D., Dauer, J. M., Kinslow, A., Lee, W., Sadler, T. D., Dauer, J. M., Romine, W. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2020). Measurement of socio-scientific reasoning ( SSR ) and exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1849853
Sato, M., Wei, R. C., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Improving teachers’ assessment practices through professional development: The Ccse of national board certification. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 669–700. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316955
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274.
Spatz, V., Tampe, J., & Slezak, C. (2019). Fostering students’ decision-making competencies. The Physics Teacher, 57, 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.513111
Sukamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2021). An intervention study on students’ decision-making towards consensus building on socio-scientific is. Internacional Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1965–1983.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In Norman G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 697–726). Routledge.
Zeidler, Dana L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Zeidler, Dana L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58.
Zeidler, Dana L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
